Showing posts with label native organizations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label native organizations. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Enough with the commercial


I love watching the Olympics - especially when you get to see Phelps breeze through history. What I don't love watching is the ANCSA Regional Association commercial. It takes some historical strides backwards for Alaska Native people.

I am not in support of the Pebble Mine, but I also think that we tend to get into other region's business a bit too much. Alaskans hate it when the rest of the U.S. tries to assert its will on Alaska - but we do it within our own state frequently enough.

It is not the support or opposition that rankles so much. It is the selling out of Native values that really gets to me.

The first statement: "For Alaska Natives, protecting the environment has always been a priority."

In one sentence, the leaders of most of the ANCSA regional corporations took a giant leap into exactly what we fight against every day. Although I think that most Alaska Native cultural groups valued and respected the land itself historically, this cannot be a statement in which we hold our heads high in today. The ANCSA leaders here made a sweeping generalization not based on fact, but on the stereotypes we don't want non-Natives to buy into.

My grandparents take excellent care of the land. If they go into "nature," they tread lightly. When gathering subsistence, they don't take more than they need, or too much from one place. They recycle. They throw chemicals away correctly. They drive as little as possible. They truly respect the earth.

But to say that the corporations make the environment a priority is simply not true. A corporation that clears vast swaths of land for development, clearcuts miles of trees, blasts holes in the earth for mines absolutely does not have the environment in mind as a priority. Profit is a priority, and it certainly doesn't came anywhere near traditional values. I was in a talk once just for Native employees of corporations - how to navigate the seeming contrary values of Native culture and corporate culture.

The trouble with criticizing Native corporations is that many people will read what I am not saying into this. For any other corporation, profit is supposed to be the top priority. Can you imagine what Nike shareholders would say if Nike decided profit was not the top priority anymore? The corporations are just doing what they were set up by the U.S. government to do, and what shareholders prefer they do.

But taking corporate leaders and twisting them into cultural leaders is what is wrong with the picture. The message that "Alaska Natives take care of the land and therefore we're experts on whether this will be good for the earth or not" - it is dangerous and irresponsible.

The CEO's and leaders of Calista, Doyon, Bering Straights Native Corp., Koniag, Chugach, NANA, Arctic Slope Region Corp., CIRI and Ahtna can support or speak out against whatever initiative that could potentially hurt their corporation's financial interests. That is, after all, their jobs. There is certainly an argument to be made about profits and jobs hanging in the balance.

But back off the generalizing and playing into Native stereotypes. Our corporate leaders need to be honest with why and what they are doing.

In this case, they don't speak for me.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Green convention

An article from Indian Country Today about the Green efforts of the Democratic convention, and some of the Native effort going into it. I was pleased to see that there are several Native organizations really focused on the environment.

There's been a lot of to do in mainstream (and not-so-mainstream) media lately about the "greening" - a whole lot of very negative press (one from the Washington Post today). Some of it's for the "color" guidelines they're using for the food, others for the big push towards reducing the carbon footprint of the convention itself.

Are people seriously mocking the efforts of those who are actually trying to encourage environmental responsibility, water conservation and good health?

The Post article in particular mocked the "color" guidelines for the caterers - that they choose a "rainbow" for each dish. Maybe it's news to them, but I worked in early childhood for several years, and this is exactly how they try and teach both parents and children how to balance meals. I think we can all see that blasting the public with percentages and ounces ("chemistry", the article says) hasn't exactly worked out for a healthier America. As a memory device, the color guidelines are much easier to remember.

I'm excited to go to this convention, and am happy to see that the DNCC is devoting so much effort to both health and the environment. This is exactly how people should approach big change - lead by example.

_